Generative Artificial Intelligence for Editorial

 

The use of generative artificial intelligence by editors of Jurnal Riset Informatika dan Komputer must be handled responsibly and must not compromise manuscript confidentiality, reviewer confidentiality, editorial independence, or publication integrity. Generative AI may support limited administrative and editorial activities, but it must not replace human editorial judgment.

1. Appropriate Uses
  • Supporting routine administrative tasks.
  • Assisting with non-substantive language or formatting checks.
  • Helping organize non-confidential editorial information.
  • Supporting general communication or workflow preparation where appropriate.
  • Assisting with routine documentation that does not expose confidential manuscript content.
2. Confidentiality Restrictions
  • Confidential manuscript content should not be submitted to public or unauthorized AI systems.
  • Reviewer identities and confidential reviewer reports must be protected.
  • Unpublished research data, proprietary information, and confidential correspondence must not be disclosed to unauthorized AI services.
  • Editors should verify the privacy and data-handling conditions of any AI system before using it for editorial purposes.
3. Human Editorial Oversight
  • Editors remain responsible for all editorial decisions.
  • AI-generated information must be independently checked before being used.
  • AI tools must not independently determine acceptance, revision, or rejection.
  • Editors should assess the accuracy, relevance, and appropriateness of any AI-assisted output.
Core Principle: Generative AI may assist editorial work where appropriate, but responsibility, confidentiality, accountability, and final judgment remain with the human editor.