Review Criteria

 

The manuscript should be evaluated comprehensively using criteria appropriate to the type of research. Reviewers should consider both the scientific content and the quality of presentation when forming their recommendation.

Scientific and Technical Criteria
  • Relevance and Timeliness: importance and timeliness of the research topic within its field.
  • Originality: originality of the research idea, method, model, system, analysis, or findings.
  • Scientific Contribution: significance of the research contribution to informatics, computer science, information technology, or related fields.
  • Technical Content and Scientific Rigor: completeness of analysis, accuracy of models, soundness of assumptions, and rigor of the research.
  • Methodological Soundness: appropriateness and clarity of the research design, data collection, processing, analysis, experiments, or computational methods.
  • Reproducibility: adequacy of methodological and technical information required for other researchers to understand or reproduce the work.
Results and Discussion Criteria
  • Results are presented clearly and systematically.
  • Numerical and experimental results are accurate and adequately explained.
  • Tables and figures appropriately support the findings.
  • The Discussion provides meaningful interpretation rather than merely repeating the Results.
  • Findings are compared with relevant previous research.
  • Similarities, differences, and possible explanations are appropriately discussed.
  • Limitations and implications are acknowledged where relevant.
Presentation and Reference Criteria
  • Manuscript structure follows the journal's requirements.
  • Language is clear, academic, and understandable.
  • Tables, figures, and equations are properly numbered and referenced.
  • Terminology and symbols are used consistently.
  • References are relevant, adequate, accurate, and appropriately cited.
  • The manuscript avoids unnecessary repetition and unsupported statements.